Did you know?

The difference between "I and my friends" and "my friends and I" is purely a matter of courtesy - they are both grammatically correct. I would tend to stick to the latter though, as it a) is more commonplace, b) is considered more polite, c) seems to flow better.5. The word "baddest" does not describe the least desirable outcome. When talking about the least desirable outcome, the word you want to use is "worst". Many wouldn't accept "baddest" as a proper word at all. "Baddest" is common slang though, especially when used in conjunction with "biggest".Sorted by: 34. Oxford lists three primary meanings for the word grow. The first two reflect what we often immediately think of when we think about growing: grow ( v.) to undergo natural development by increasing in size and changing physically. grow ( v.) to become larger or greater over a period of time; to increase.to fill in. to see through. to figure out. to show off. to go away. to write up. These verbs all have distinct senses compared to the plain verbs. To fall and to fall down have very similar meanings, but they are distinct. As outis nihil noted, 'to fall down the stairs' is very different to 'to fall on the stairs'.The word "contrast" conveys a stark difference in the degree to which two otherwise similar objects possess an attribute. Dark, depressing books and bonobos are too dissimilar to be in contrast, whereas the former do contrast with light hearted, trivial books.. If there is a valid context for comparison between the statistics and the figure, and this comparison …May 20, 2015 · Grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) have been used to elicit data reflecting second language (L2) speakers’ knowledge of L2 grammar. However, the exact constructs measured by GJTs, whether primarily implicit or explicit knowledge, are disputed and have been argued to differ depending on test-related variables (i.e., time pressure and item grammaticality). Acceptability judgments present a serious problem for both classical binary and probabilistic theories of grammaticality. These judgements are gradient in nature, and so cannot be directly accommodated in a binary formal grammar. However, it is also not possible to simply reduce acceptability to probability.The ungrammaticality is not related to the fact that V cannot take IP as complement. This fact is evidenced by (1) and (2) (hence your first question):In British English, there are some uses where am/is/are having is idiomatic, for example: for some mental states or personal experiences: I'm having second thoughts about going out tonight. He's having a panic attack. They're having fun. where have has the meaning being the host for (either an event or a visitor), and with a sense of future ...1 Answer. The sentence is ungrammatical. Began never takes an auxiliary verb, while begun always does. Began is the simple past of begin and begun is the past participle. You use began for an isolated action, and begun with an action alongside something else. Paolo was appointed captain of Roma.Jan 25, 2014 at 7:28. "When it comes after to, it will always be a form of whom." This isn't correct. In this case, "whomever" happens to be grammatical because it's the object of the relative clause "whomever it may concern." But in another context, such as "to whoever was there," the pronoun might be the subject of the relative clause, and in ...The Oxford Living Dictionaries says the following, about the usage of or. (Similar definition was given from the NOAD I had installed on my Mac Mini, the copy that comes with the Dictionary application together the OS.)The plural possessive is "ladies'." "Lady" is singular, so if you were referring solely to one woman's shoes, it would be "the lady's shoes." As for your second question, I'm assuming you're referring to a group of women in your salutation of them, so it would be "Good morning, ladies." And as you're addressing them directly, the comma ...Acceptability and grammaticality are clearly closely related, but the relationship is not always straightforward. Sometimes, sentences that are thought to be ungrammatical are perceived as acceptable, leading to an illusion of grammaticality, or grammatical sentences are perceived as unacceptable, leading to an illusion of ungrammaticality.

The construction GO + V + ING is among one of the first things a learner is taught. Take for instance the verb swim, very often English expresses the activity in the present simple like this:. I go swimming twice a week . This construction is used with any 'outdoorsy' or sport activity that employs a verb, such as:Grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) have been used to elicit data reflecting second language (L2) speakers' knowledge of L2 grammar.You would write "in die Schule" (accusative) if you are talking about going to school. Ich gehe in die Schule. "Zur Schule" is equivalent to "in die Schule". It is commonly used and grammatically right and equivalent to say either "Ich gehe in die Schule" or "Ich gehe zur Schule".You can do it (i.e. it's grammatical), but it probably doesn't have the meaning you want. You are probably trying to say: Regarding the email below, I have sent all the required data to you.. This means that the required data is referenced in the email and you are responding to it by sending that data.

Numbers 1 and 3 are both correct, because subjects and verbs are in agreement. Number 2 is incorrect, because the verb no longer agrees with the subject. Asked another way, the answer to question "X is the primary cause of...and Y is the primary consequence of...." seems to indicate "are" is the wrong choice.This paper provides a critical review of the state of the art in code-switching research being conducted in linguistics. Three issues of theoretical and practical importance are explored: (a) code-switching vs. borrowing; (b) grammaticality; and (c) variability vs. uniformity, and I take a position on all three issues. Regarding switching vs. borrowing, I argue that not all lone other-language ...…

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. All three are acceptable and in use. The form that is selected mig. Possible cause: Asking Google produces this. Getting relative pronouns like "who" to agree .